Dear all,
I´m starting to customize automatic FF.5 for SWIFT MT940 via Web Service but the problem is that we will receive more than 100 files per day (different banks accounts)
To upload the file I´m working with an ABAP. But I don´t know how to treat the error cases. How we can get a log or how we can identify when a file was processed with error?
Could somebody help me?
Thank you so much for your help
Martin
I have a situation where my client needs to post to differnt GL accounts for the same BAI code. In addition, there are 2 BAI codes that use the same search string text. The search string rule is not taking into account the BAI code when posting. I have set up configuration for both search strings and a default rule in the global settings. I have performed an upload of the bank statement and came up with incorrect results. Here's the specifics:
Search String config:
BAI code 165 contains search string "PAYMENTECH TRANSFER" and maps to rule D900.
BAI code 455 contains search string "PAYMENTECH TRANSFER" and maps to rule C631.
Global Parameters:
BAI code 165 default posting rule set to D910.
BAI code 455 default posting rule set to C003.
I'm using the standard algorithm 001 in the search string set up and in my default global parameters. All search strings are active. No clearing needs to take place in these postings; just debits and credits to house banks and GL accounts defined in my posting rules. I'm on R/3 4.7e. I have other similarly configured search strings and all post with same result.
In my test upload, both BAI codes utilizing above mapped search strings found posting rule D900; instead I want to post BAI code 455 to posting rule C631.
I assumed that the BAI code would be taken into consideration when finding the search string rule to post against. Is there anyone else who has come into this issue and solved? I'm hoping I don't need to employ a user exit or custom develoment for this work.
Any advice would be helpful.
Regards,
Sandy
I have transactions on customer/vendor accounts which are part of a treasury interface. Interface credits/debits bank, debits customer/vendor account. Normally we would raise invoices to clear. Treasury interface is not working correctly so all codings are incorrect. What I need to do is reverse all the transactions and re input by journal upload. I have tried using FB08 to reverse the transactions but found out I cannot use this as there are cross company transactions and I can't alter other entity ledgers.
I have tried using an upload sheet using Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4 rather than 40 50 but I am using the control accounts code in the G/L and again it doesn't work.
What is the best way to do this and can someone help with advice?
Hello Experts,
I customized just the fixed term deposit and it is working generally OK.
I am using the differential procedure for accrual/deferral and not reversal procedure. The problem is now that when the interest flow is paid at the end of the contract period the interest revenue account is doubled. This is because the differential procedure create interest revenue posting on the account (receivable on interest/interest revenue) and the interest flow at the end as well (bank clearing/interest revenue).
Is there a special customizing step for this or how can I fix this?
Any help is appreciated.
Kind regards
Ruslan
Hi...
My user txn already completed using workflow. Now they want to post using TBB1_LC because don't want to posted to FI but after untick the test run the message "No flow exist for processing" appear. After checking the workflow overview the txn completed. How they want to post without going to FI ? I have attachment to show.
TQ.
Hi,
I have a situation where reversal for cleared incoming payment is not hitting bank account thus causing balance in bank and GL clearing account is not correct.
Normally, user will post repayment due (installment, unscheduled repayment) by FNM1. This transaction will hit
Dr Customer
Cr Loans Account
Then, our practice is to post incoming payment through FB05
Dr Banks
Cr Customer.
To clear incoming payment and repayment due, then go to FZNB, which will hit
Dr Customer
Cr Loan GL Clearing
Dr Loan GL Clearing
Cr Customer.
=========================================================================================
Now, user need to reverse thru FNM3 and entries as below :
Dr Loans
Cr Customer
Dr Customer
Cr GL Clearing
Now the result will cause
Dr Bank - (should be reversed)
Cr Clearing - (should be reversed)
For current solution, user has to clear balance in bank and GL clearing manually by posting
Dr GL Clearing
Cr Bank
User feels its a hassle for them to perform another extra step. Any gurus, please help to solve this issue.
Hello,
I am looking for a BAPI to create Company code data for Business Partner (BP).
Can you please help me with the same.
Thanks in Advance!!
Hi Team,
We have an issue with the Interest capitalization for a loan.
We have taken a loan for 3 month in which the interest has to be capitalize for twice in a month i.e. 15th & 30th of every month
For example
Loan Amt : 10000
Int rate : 12%
Start date : 01.10.2012
End date : 30.12.2012
The system is calculating the interest as below based on the base amount
| Date | Base Amt | Interest Amt |
|---|---|---|
| 15.10.2012 | 10,000.00 | 46.00 |
| 30.10.2012 | 10,046.00 | 50.00 |
15.11.2012 | 10,096.00 | 50.00 |
30.11.2012 | 10,146.00 | 50.00 |
15.12.2012 | 10,196.00 | 50.00 |
30.12.2012 | 10,246.00 | 51.00 |
But our requirement is as below
| Date | Base Amt | Interest Amt |
|---|---|---|
| 15.10.2012 | 10,000.00 | 46.00 |
| 30.10.2012 | 10,046.00 | 50.00 |
15.11.2012 | 10,000.00 | 46.00 |
30.11.2012 | 10,046.00 | 50.00 |
15.12.2012 | 10,000.00 | 46.00 |
30.12.2012 | 10,046.00 | 50.00 |
The system has to take the base amount on15th as 10,000. and on 30th as 10,046 (base amt of 15th + Interest amt of 15th)
Please let me know how to get the calculation mentioned above !!!!
Regards,
Venkat
Folks,
I have created FX Spot transaction (60A, ttype 101) to sell Euro and buy USD with cash settlement in USD. We have a favorable exchange rate so we expect net settlement (gain) accounting entry in USD. Example - Debit Cash and Credit Clearing a/c.
When I run TBB1, system is creating two GL entries and two separate documents: one entry for cash settlement in USD and second entry for Euro amount. Also both entries have same update type FX1031+
My question is why system is creating second GL entry in Euro? How come both GL entries have same update type FX1031+?
Thanks in advance,
Amit
We just noticed there is a problem in the interest accrual computation as currently performed by the Treasury management System.
The scenario is the following ;
-the 18th of December we got interest payment covering the period up to 12/30/2012. Running TBB1 the system posted the related cash flows plus December accrual up to 12/30.
-Accrual through TPM44 have been in a second step run the 18th & the 31st generating again postings but with wrong numbers
Bottom line is that accruals at end of year on 12/31/2012 for that deal as per posting are $ 12,706.25 instead of 508.25, which is not correct.
Assumption is that could ‘ve happened every time interest cash flows ‘ve been posted and accrual portion booked when running TBB1.
All the details are here attached.
12/18/2012
TBB1 -95,831.02 Interest Payment
TBB1 -83,353.00 Interest Payment
TBB1 15,247.50 December Accruals until 12/30/2012 (4500000*0.04066*(30/360))
12/18/2012
TPM44 6,099.00 December Accruals corresponding to 12 days(4500000*0.04066*(12/360))
12/31/2012
TPM44 6,607.25 December Accruals corresponding to 13 days (4500000*0.04066*(13/360)
but sould be
12/31/2012
TPM44 508.25 one day accrual (4500000*0.04066*(1/360) )
Please help me to resolve this issue
Hello,
I got a message error during the clearing of customer payments in FF_5. The open items must be cleared automatically, but instead of it shows the message: (F5 263) - The Difference is to high for clearing" and "Payment advice D xxxxxx (customer number) xxxxxxxxxxxx (long number) created.". I go into the FEBAN and save one by one. No message error, the clearing is posted without any adjustment.
* There isn´t difference in the amount, OT51 and OT58 are correct, I got the error only in production environment not in test.
Do you guys know about some solution? I appreciate any help.
Estou com o mesmo problema que um colega ja expos aqui no ano passado, mas a solução não me atendeu, então caso alguém tenha alguma outra por favor se possível compartilhar....É o seguinte: Importação de arquivo retorno de cobrança (Itau e Bco do Brasil) através da FF_5 - Mensagem: "(F5 263) - The Difference is to high for clearing". O título está com exatamente o mesmo valor, as datas compatíveis e os mesmos números de documento, porém não é compensado automaticamente, diz "aviso de pagamento D xxxxxxx criado", dai eu vou na FEBAN e consigo compensar um a um sem nenhuma correção no lançamento, só marcar e salvar.
*Detalhe o erro não acontece no ambiente de teste, só na produção, comparei transações ref. limites de tolerancia, estão iguais nos 2 ambientes.....
Já procurei notas, mas nenhuma fala diretamente deste erro: Algum cristo já passou por isso? Agradeço qq help.
Hello, gurus!
While trying to post amortization amount for interest rate instrument (product category 550), I faced the problem: system makes no adjustment of the amortization by the amount of accrued interest (using cash flow method in accordance with IAS39). I noticed that this possibility is present for securities.
My 1st question is why only securities?
The 2nd question is how to make adjustment postings to post accrued interest separately from the principal debt value. Otherwise I have to refuse using TPM44 to avoid duplicating of the accrued interest. It seems queer to me.
Thanks for any answers,
Alex
Hi All,
We have set up EBS for incoming EDIFACT IDOCS with message type FINSTA, the process for clearing customer line item with Pay order number is:
1) EDIFACT message generates the IDOC in ECC with BUSZFO as 80,
2) BUSZFO is mapped with external transaction type 80
3) External transaction type 80 is mapped with Interpretation algorithm 029
4) IA 029 is expected to find the pay order from Customer line items
5) Posting rule Z501 assigned to 029 post with clearing customer line item with sub ledger clearing (posting type 8)
When i am processing FEBP to update the bank statment encounterring a "Error: (F5 263) The difference is too large for clearing" when trying to post with FEBAN entry posting is not able to find pay order which is comming in from IDOC and entry got sutck at selction screen of open items (SAPMF05A-710).
Can anybody let me know if we need to additional customisation or i need to apply any note / patch.
Regards,
Parag
Hello All,
I have created an account in F9K2 for TWD currency .There was one posting order and then it was reversed .Now company wants to change the currency to USD for the same account in F9K2 .But the currency field is greyed out (Cannot be chnaged ) .I could change the currency for the same account in test system where there was no posting or reversal.
Any one had this kind of scenario .Please update with you valuable solution.
Thanks
Dear All,
We want to activate manual input for the netting transaction while making a rollover.
If we activate "New basis" for transaction type 102, the manual input is available for both rollover and premature settlement.
But we do not want to activate "New Basis" for Premature Settlement.
We want it only for rollover.
How to enable the "New Basis" for Netting transaction only for Rollover?
Thanks,
Vinod P
Dear Expert,
In the liquidity forecast report (FF7B), the customer invoice amount is still displayed with entire deduction of cash discount even if cash discount term has already expired and payment terms describe discount applicability upto a certain date.
Please advice how past due dates of a customer invoice when cash discount applicability gets over, still the relevant document displays the figure post calculation of cash discount as per payment terms.
Thanks and Regards,
Abhishek
Dear Experts,
While posting the gain or loss entry in TPM18 for Premature Settled contracts, the system is picking the Exchange rate from OB08 table, instead it should calculate the gain or loss based on the original contract booking rate.
For example:
I have booked a forward contract at INR57 for USD/INR with maturity date - 31.03.2013.
I am cancelling the contract on 28.02.2013 at INR55. When I do a premature settlement, I enter the cancellation rate and the value date as 28.02.2013.
Now there are two transactions created i.e. 105 and 103.
While posting the gain or loss for transaction 105, the system calculates the gain or loss based on the exchange rate on 28.02.2013, but instead it should calculate the gain or loss on the booked rate which is INR57.
I know the round about solution of maintaining the forward rate i.e. INR 57 in Edit Flows under Cash Flow tab.
But why the system calculates the gain or loss based on the exchange rate prevailing on the date of cancellation, instead of picking the original booking rate automatically?
Is there a way to automatically populate the original rate in the 105 contract?
Am I missing any configuration?
Regards,
Kamal
Dear Experts,
How to assign a hedging transaction to the exposures?
I have done the following steps:
1. I have created a Hedge Plan in THMEX.
2. I have created raw exposures and transferred the versioned exposures to Hedge Management from TEM20.
3. Now I have created a transaction and inserted into the Existing Hedge Plan.
When I try to assign a transaction to the Hedge Plan from the Hedge Management tab, the system creates a new Hedged Item ID and Exposure ID. The transactions do not reflect in the exposures when I try to run TEM20 for analysis. I dont see any link between the Exposures and the Hedging instrument.
Please find attached screenshot.
What is it that I am doing wrong here?
Please help
Thanks,
Vinod P
Dear Experts,
When I try to delete the Hedged Item from Hedge Plan, I am getting the following error message
"
I have dissolved the hedge relationship of transactions but still I am getting the error.
How to delete the relationship history?
Please find the screenshot attached.
Please help
Thanks,
Vinod P
Dear Experts,
While transferring the Versioned Exposure to Hedge Management, I get the error message FTR0899 when the Exposure Amount is Negative. It gets successfully transferred if the Exposure Amount is Positive.
Error Message:
"
Am I missing something in Configuration, as this seems to be a standard error message.
Thanks,
Kamal